Michael B. Hall

Find an error

Name: Hall, Michael ?B
Organization: Texas A&M University , USA
Department: Department of Chemistry
Title: Associate(PhD)

TOPICS

Co-reporter:Ryan D. Bethel; Danielle J. Crouthers; Chung-Hung Hsieh; Jason A. Denny; Michael B. Hall;Marcetta Y. Darensbourg
Inorganic Chemistry 2015 Volume 54(Issue 7) pp:3523-3535
Publication Date(Web):March 13, 2015
DOI:10.1021/acs.inorgchem.5b00072
The discovery of a diiron organometallic site in nature within the diiron hydrogenase, [FeFe]-H2ase, active site has prompted revisits of the classic organometallic chemistry involving the Fe–Fe bond and bridging ligands, particularly of the (μ-SCH2XCH2S)[Fe(CO)3]2 and (μ-SCH2XCH2S)[Fe(CO)2L]2 (X = CH2, NH; L = PMe3, CN–, and NHC’s (NHC = N-heterocyclic carbene)), derived from CO/L exchange reactions. Through the synergy of synthetic chemistry and density functional theory computations, the regioselectivity of nucleophilic (PMe3 or CN–) and electrophilic (nitrosonium, NO+) ligand substitution on the diiron dithiolate framework of the (μ-pdt)[Fe(CO)2NHC][Fe(CO)3] complex (pdt = propanedithiolate) reveals the electron density shifts in the diiron core of such complexes that mimic the [FeFe]-H2ase active site. While CO substitution by PMe3, followed by reaction with NO+, produces (μ-pdt)(μ-CO)[Fe(NHC)(NO)][Fe(CO)2PMe3]+, the alternate order of reagent addition produces the structural isomer (μ-pdt)[Fe(NHC)(NO)PMe3][Fe(CO)3]+, illustrating how the nucleophile and electrophile choose the electron-poor metal and the electron-rich metal, respectively. Theoretical explorations of simpler analogues, (μ-pdt)[Fe(CO)2CN][Fe(CO)3]−, (μ-pdt)[Fe(CO)3]2, and (μ-pdt)[Fe(CO)2NO][Fe(CO)3]+, provide an explanation for the role that the electron-rich iron moiety plays in inducing the rotation of the electron-poor iron moiety to produce a bridging CO ligand, a key factor in stabilizing the electron-rich iron moiety and for support of the rotated structure as found in the enzyme active site.
Co-reporter:Michael B. Hall;Justin R. Walensky
Inorganic Chemistry 2015 Volume 54(Issue 7) pp:3536-3544
Publication Date(Web):March 10, 2015
DOI:10.1021/acs.inorgchem.5b00080
The heavy-atom heterocycle Pd[Re2(CO)8(μ-SbPh2)(μ-H)]2 (5) has been synthesized by the palladium-catalyzed ring-opening cyclodimerization of the three-membered heterocycle Re2(CO)8(μ-SbPh2)(μ-H) (3). The Pd atom occupies the center of the ring. The Pd atom in 5 can be removed reversibly to yield the palladium-free heterocycle [Re2(CO)8((μ-SbPh2)(μ-H)]2 (6).
Co-reporter:Zhenggang Xu, Michael B. Hall
Inorganica Chimica Acta 2014 Volume 422() pp:40-46
Publication Date(Web):1 October 2014
DOI:10.1016/j.ica.2014.07.057
•2+2 cycloaddition to OsSiR is under kinetic control.•Kinetic control is due to sterics.•Product structures confirmed by computed NMR chemical shift.The [2+2] cycloaddition reactivity of an osmium silylyne compound 2, [Cp∗(iPr3P)(H)OsSi(Trip)][HB(C6F5)3], with PhCCPh or PCtBu was studied by density functional theory (DFT) computations. Results indicate that these two reactions are under kinetic control in room temperature and the kinetic products were detected by NMR in experiments. Further tests revealed that the interplay between steric effects and the bonding interactions between two reacting fragments is majorly responsible for the energy differences in different isomers.The [2+2] cycloaddition reactivity of an osmium silylyne compound 2, [Cp∗(iPr3P)(H)OsSi(Trip)][HB(C6F5)3], with PhCCPh or PCtBu was studied by density functional theory (DFT) computations. These two reactions appear to be under kinetic control due to complex interplay between steric effects and the bonding interactions between two reacting fragments.
Co-reporter:Chung-Hung Hsieh, Scott M. Brothers, Joseph H. Reibenspies, Michael B. Hall, Codrina V. Popescu, and Marcetta Y. Darensbourg
Inorganic Chemistry 2013 Volume 52(Issue 4) pp:2119-2124
Publication Date(Web):February 1, 2013
DOI:10.1021/ic3025149
To explore the effect of delocalization in the Fe(NO)2 unit on possible linkage isomerism of ambidentate ECN– ligands, E = S and O, anionic DNICs, dinitrosyl iron complexes, (SCN)2Fe(NO)2– (1) and (OCN)2Fe(NO)2– (2) were synthesized by the reaction of in situ-generated [Fe(CO)2(NO)2]+ and PPN+ECN–. Other {Fe(NO)2}9 (Enemark–Feltham notation) complexes, (N3)2Fe(NO)2– and (PhS)2Fe(NO)2–, were prepared for comparison. The X-ray diffraction analysis of 1 and 2 yielded the typical tetrahedral structures of DNICs with two slightly bent Fe–N–O oriented toward each other, and linear FeNCE units. The ν(NO) IR values shift to lower values for 1 > 2 > (N3)2Fe(NO)2– > (PhS)2Fe(NO)2–, reflecting the increasing donor ability of the ancillary ligands and consistent with the redox potentials of the complexes, and the small trends in Mössbauer isomer shifts. Computational studies corroborate that the {Fe(NO)2}9 motif prefers N-bound rather than E-bound isomers. The calculated energy differences between the linkage isomers of 1 (Fe-NCS preferred over Fe-SCN by about 6 kcal/mol) are smaller than those of 2 (Fe-NCO preferred over Fe-OCN by about 16 kcal/mol), a difference that is justified by the frontier molecular orbitals of the ligands themselves.
Co-reporter:Li Dang ; Mohamed F. Shibl ; Xinzheng Yang ; Aiman Alak ; Daniel J. Harrison ; Ulrich Fekl ; Edward N. Brothers
Journal of the American Chemical Society 2012 Volume 134(Issue 10) pp:4481-4484
Publication Date(Web):February 24, 2012
DOI:10.1021/ja2107965
The binding of an alkene by Ni(tfd)2 [tfd = S2C2(CF3)2] is one of the most intriguing ligand-based reactions. In the presence of the anionic, reduced metal complex, the primary product is an interligand adduct, while in the absence of the anion, dihydrodithiins and metal complex decomposition products are preferred. New kinetic (global analysis) and computational (DFT) data explain the crucial role of the anion in suppressing decomposition and catalyzing the formation of the interligand product through a dimetallic complex that appears to catalyze alkene addition across the Ni–S bond, leading to a lower barrier for the interligand adduct.
Co-reporter:Caiping Liu;Jamie N. T. Peck;Joseph A. Wright;Christopher J. Pickett
European Journal of Inorganic Chemistry 2011 Volume 2011( Issue 7) pp:1080-1093
Publication Date(Web):
DOI:10.1002/ejic.201001085

Abstract

Results of density functional theory (DFT) calculations on the protonation of the [FeFe]-hydrogenase model complex, Fe2(μ-pdt)(CO)4(PMe3)2 (pdt = propane-1,3-dithiolate), show that diiron bridging-hydride species are more stable than iron terminal-hydride, sulfur-hydride, or formyl isomers. Consistent with experimental observation, the transoid basal/basal forms are more stable than other μ-H isomers. With an ether as the proton carrier, [Et2OH]+, the favoured reaction pathways appear to involve weak coordination to CO followed by transfer of the proton from ether to an iron terminal site rather than directly to the bridging site. These kinetically favoured terminal-hydride species isomerize through a low-energy Ray-Dutt twist to produce the apical/basal bridging-hydride isomer. This isomer rearranges over somewhat higher barrier Bailar twists to the cisoid and transoid basal/basal isomers, the former finally rearranging to the latter isomer.

Zirconium(1+), trihydro-
Manganese(1+), nitrosyl-
Scandium(1+), nitrosyl-
Tricyclo[3.3.1.13,7]decane-1-carboxamide, N-(1,1-dimethylethoxy)-
lac20 radical
lac15 radical
lac14 radical
lac13 radical
lac12 radical
Hydrazine, 1-hydroxy-1-nitroso-