Co-reporter:Michael Jerrett, David Donaire-Gonzalez, Olalekan Popoola, Roderic Jones, Ronald C. Cohen, Estela Almanza, Audrey de Nazelle, Iq Mead, Glòria Carrasco-Turigas, Tom Cole-Hunter, Margarita Triguero-Mas, Edmund Seto, Mark Nieuwenhuijsen
Environmental Research 2017 Volume 158(Volume 158) pp:
Publication Date(Web):1 October 2017
DOI:10.1016/j.envres.2017.04.023
•Correlations between the personal sensors and more expensive research instruments were higher than with the government monitors.•The sensors were able to detect high and low air pollution levels in agreement with expectations (e.g., high levels on or near busy roadways and lower levels in background residential areas and parks).•Our finding suggests that the low cost, personal sensors have potential to reduce exposure measurement error in epidemiological studies and provide valid data for citizen science studies.Low cost, personal air pollution sensors may reduce exposure measurement errors in epidemiological investigations and contribute to citizen science initiatives. Here we assess the validity of a low cost personal air pollution sensor. Study participants were drawn from two ongoing epidemiological projects in Barcelona, Spain. Participants repeatedly wore the pollution sensor − which measured carbon monoxide (CO), nitric oxide (NO), and nitrogen dioxide (NO2). We also compared personal sensor measurements to those from more expensive instruments. Our personal sensors had moderate to high correlations with government monitors with averaging times of 1-h and 30-min epochs (r ~ 0.38–0.8) for NO and CO, but had low to moderate correlations with NO2 (~0.04–0.67). Correlations between the personal sensors and more expensive research instruments were higher than with the government monitors. The sensors were able to detect high and low air pollution levels in agreement with expectations (e.g., high levels on or near busy roadways and lower levels in background residential areas and parks). Our findings suggest that the low cost, personal sensors have potential to reduce exposure measurement error in epidemiological studies and provide valid data for citizen science studies.
Co-reporter:Graeme M. Hansford, Ray A. Freshwater, Ronald A. Bosch, R. Anthony Cox, Roderic L. Jones, Keith F. E. Pratt and David E. Williams
Environmental Science: Nano 2005 vol. 7(Issue 2) pp:158-162
Publication Date(Web):15 Dec 2004
DOI:10.1039/B412184H
The design of an instrument based on a solid state tungsten oxide sensor for making profile measurements of atmospheric ozone from balloon platforms is described. The sensor is operated at a constant temperature, typically 530 °C. The importance of a detailed consideration of the electronic design is demonstrated, with particular reference to the circuit to control the sensor heater. Calibration methods which are straightforward to implement are illustrated, and the results of a test flight alongside an electrochemical ozonesonde are shown. Quantitative agreement within 25% for most of the profile demonstrates the potential of this type of sensor for ozone sounding. Future improvements from manufacture to analysis are expected to improve on this.