George M. Bodner

Find an error

Name: Bodner, George
Organization: Purdue University , USA
Department: Department of Chemistry
Title: (PhD)
Co-reporter:George M. Bodner
Journal of Chemical Education 2014 Volume 91(Issue 1) pp:3-5
Publication Date(Web):December 23, 2013
DOI:10.1021/ed4007887
This commentary briefly describes the creation and organizational structure of a new American Association of Chemistry Teachers, as well as the member benefits.Keywords: Elementary/Middle School Science; General Public; High School/Introductory Chemistry;
Co-reporter:Amy L. Micklos Lewis and George M. Bodner  
Chemistry Education Research and Practice 2013 vol. 14(Issue 4) pp:625-636
Publication Date(Web):19 Sep 2013
DOI:10.1039/C3RP00109A
This study examined the understanding of chemical equations developed by three students with blindness who were enrolled in the same secondary-school chemistry class. The students were interviewed while interpreting and balancing chemical equations. During the course of these interviews, the students produced diagrams using Braille symbols that provided insight into how they visualized the various components of the equations used to represent chemical reactions. The results of this study suggested that these students all possessed views of the symbolic representations of chemical reactions that differed from those of practicing chemists. The alternative views the students had of these symbols, however, did not differ significantly from the results of previous studies conducted with students with sight. The results of this study suggest that current pedagogical practices should be revised to enhance the conceptual understanding that all students develop of the symbolic representations used to describe chemical reactions.
Co-reporter:George M. Bodner  
Chemistry Education Research and Practice 2007 vol. 8(Issue 1) pp:93-100
Publication Date(Web):
DOI:10.1039/B4RP90007C
Both research on learning across a wide range of disciplines and common theories of learning recognize the importance of learning through making connections between new concepts to which one is exposed and existing cognitive structures or schemata. This paper considers examples of underappreciated cognitive connections that our experience has shown can facilitate students‘ learning of chemistry in the introductory course. The first deals with the question of whether the ‘common-ion effect’ is limited to discussions of solubility product equilibrium, as many textbooks seem to indicate. The second example questions why certain traditional approaches to teaching the chemistry of conjugate oxidizing agents and reducing agents are not applied to discussions of the chemistry of conjugate Brønsted acids and bases. [Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., 2007, 8 (1), 93-100]
Co-reporter:Dawn Del Carlo;George Bodner
Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education 2006 Volume 34(Issue 5) pp:
Publication Date(Web):6 DEC 2006
DOI:10.1002/bmb.2006.494034052657

Although reports of academic cheating are abundant, there are relatively few papers in the literature that focus on cheating in the context of science courses and even fewer that address dishonest practices, such as “cooking” or fudging data, within the classroom laboratory. This paper briefly reviews the existing literature on academic dishonesty and explores two theories that can be used to explain why cheating occurs: (1) classroom goal structure and (2) attitudes of neutralization. We conclude with a discussion of the implications of these theories within the context of a biochemistry and molecular biology teaching laboratory.

bis(dimethylamino)phenylphosphine(pentacarbonyl)chromium(0)
Chromium,(aminophenylmethylene)pentacarbonyl-(oc-6-21)-
Chromium, pentacarbonyl(triphenylarsine)-, (OC-6-22)-
PENTACARBONYL(METHOXYPHENYLCARBENE)CHROMIUM(0)
Chromium, pentacarbonyl(trimethylphosphine)-
Arsine, dibutylphenyl-
chromium, pentacarbonyl-(triethylphosphine)-
Molybdenum, pentacarbonyl(triethylphosphine)-
Molybdenum,pentacarbonyl(triphenylarsine)-