Marina Rodnina

Find an error

Name:
Organization: Max Planck Institute of Biophysical Chemistry
Department: Department of Physical Biochemistry
Title:
Co-reporter:Michael Thommen, Wolf Holtkamp, Marina V Rodnina
Current Opinion in Structural Biology 2017 Volume 42(Volume 42) pp:
Publication Date(Web):1 February 2017
DOI:10.1016/j.sbi.2016.11.020
•Proteins begin to fold within the polypeptide exit tunnel of the ribosome.•Ribosomes change the landscape of protein folding.•Ribosomes can stabilize non-native compact structures within the tunnel.•Synonymous codons regulate translation velocity and affect protein folding.•Biophysical techniques provide new insights in co-translational protein folding.Proteins are synthesized as linear polymers and have to fold into their native structure to fulfil various functions in the cell. Folding can start co-translationally when the emerging peptide is still attached to the ribosome and is guided by the environment of the polypeptide exit tunnel and the kinetics of translation. Major questions are: When does co-translational folding begin? What is the role of the ribosome in guiding the nascent peptide towards its native structure? How does translation elongation kinetics modulate protein folding? Here we suggest how novel structural and biophysical approaches can help to probe the interplay between the ribosome and the emerging peptide and present future challenges in understanding co-translational folding.
Co-reporter:Akanksha Goyal, Riccardo Belardinelli, Marina V. Rodnina
Cell Reports 2017 Volume 20, Issue 13(Volume 20, Issue 13) pp:
Publication Date(Web):26 September 2017
DOI:10.1016/j.celrep.2017.09.012
•Initiation factor 3 (IF3) can remain bound to the 70S IC after subunit joining•IF3 binds to the 50S subunit near the ribosomal protein L33•The interaction is largely electrostatic with high association and dissociation rates•The interaction may be physiologically relevant for non-canonical initiation pathwaysCanonical translation initiation in bacteria entails the assembly of the 30S initiation complex (IC), which binds the 50S subunit to form a 70S IC. IF3, a key initiation factor, is recruited to the 30S subunit at an early stage and is displaced from its primary binding site upon subunit joining. We employed four different FRET pairs to monitor IF3 relocation after 50S joining. IF3 moves away from the 30S subunit, IF1 and IF2, but can remain bound to the mature 70S IC. The secondary binding site is located on the 50S subunit in the vicinity of ribosomal protein L33. The interaction between IF3 and the 50S subunit is largely electrostatic with very high rates of IF3 binding and dissociation. The existence of the non-canonical binding site may help explain how IF3 participates in alternative initiation modes performed directly by the 70S ribosomes, such as initiation on leaderless mRNAs or re-initiation.Download high-res image (208KB)Download full-size image
Co-reporter:Neva Caliskan, Ingo Wohlgemuth, Natalia Korniy, Michael Pearson, ... Marina V. Rodnina
Molecular Cell 2017 Volume 66, Issue 4(Volume 66, Issue 4) pp:
Publication Date(Web):18 May 2017
DOI:10.1016/j.molcel.2017.04.023
•–1 frameshifting predominantly occurs upon translocation of two slippery-site tRNAs•An alternative frameshifting pathway operates when aminoacyl-tRNA supply is limited•Hungry frameshifting is slow and independent of the mRNA secondary structure element•Switching between frameshifting routes can enrich coding capacity of the genomeRibosome frameshifting during translation of bacterial dnaX can proceed via different routes, generating a variety of distinct polypeptides. Using kinetic experiments, we show that –1 frameshifting predominantly occurs during translocation of two tRNAs bound to the slippery sequence codons. This pathway depends on a stem-loop mRNA structure downstream of the slippery sequence and operates when aminoacyl-tRNAs are abundant. However, when aminoacyl-tRNAs are in short supply, the ribosome switches to an alternative frameshifting pathway that is independent of a stem-loop. Ribosome stalling at a vacant 0-frame A-site codon results in slippage of the P-site peptidyl-tRNA, allowing for –1-frame decoding. When the –1-frame aminoacyl-tRNA is lacking, the ribosomes switch into –2 frame. Quantitative mass spectrometry shows that the –2-frame product is synthesized in vivo. We suggest that switching between frameshifting routes may enrich gene expression at conditions of aminoacyl-tRNA limitation.Download high-res image (183KB)Download full-size image
Co-reporter:Cristina Maracci ;Marina V. Rodnina
Biopolymers 2016 Volume 105( Issue 8) pp:463-475
Publication Date(Web):
DOI:10.1002/bip.22832

ABSTRACT

Translational GTPases (trGTPases) play key roles in facilitating protein synthesis on the ribosome. Despite the high degree of evolutionary conservation in the sequences of their GTP-binding domains, the rates of GTP hydrolysis and nucleotide exchange vary broadly between different trGTPases. EF-Tu, one of the best-characterized model G proteins, evolved an exceptionally rapid and tightly regulated GTPase activity, which ensures rapid and accurate incorporation of amino acids into the nascent chain. Other trGTPases instead use the energy of GTP hydrolysis to promote movement or to ensure the forward commitment of translation reactions. Recent data suggest the GTPase mechanism of EF-Tu and provide an insight in the catalysis of GTP hydrolysis by its unusual activator, the ribosome. Here we summarize these advances in understanding the functional cycle and the regulation of trGTPases, stimulated by the elucidation of their structures on the ribosome and the progress in dissecting the reaction mechanism of GTPases. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Biopolymers 105: 463–475, 2016.

Co-reporter:Lili K. Doerfel; Ingo Wohlgemuth; Vladimir Kubyshkin; Agata L. Starosta; Daniel N. Wilson; Nediljko Budisa;Marina V. Rodnina
Journal of the American Chemical Society 2015 Volume 137(Issue 40) pp:12997-13006
Publication Date(Web):September 18, 2015
DOI:10.1021/jacs.5b07427
The peptide bond formation with the amino acid proline (Pro) on the ribosome is slow, resulting in translational stalling when several Pro have to be incorporated into the peptide. Stalling at poly-Pro motifs is alleviated by the elongation factor P (EF-P). Here we investigate why Pro is a poor substrate and how EF-P catalyzes the reaction. Linear free energy relationships of the reaction on the ribosome and in solution using 12 different Pro analogues suggest that the positioning of Pro-tRNA in the peptidyl transferase center is the major determinant for the slow reaction. With any Pro analogue tested, EF-P decreases the activation energy of the reaction by an almost uniform value of 2.5 kcal/mol. The main source of catalysis is the favorable entropy change brought about by EF-P. Thus, EF-P acts by entropic steering of Pro-tRNA toward a catalytically productive orientation in the peptidyl transferase center of the ribosome.
Co-reporter:Wolf Holtkamp;Goran Kokic;Marcus Jäger;Joerg Mittelstaet;Anton A. Komar;Marina V. Rodnina
Science 2015 Volume 350(Issue 6264) pp:
Publication Date(Web):
DOI:10.1126/science.aad0344

Proteins shape up in the ribosome

Proteins consist of linear chains of amino acids. These chains must fold into complex three-dimensional shapes to become functional. Holtkamp et al. “watched” how a small helical protein folds as it is being synthesized by the ribosome. The lengthening polypeptide passes out through the ribosome exit tunnel where folding starts. The initially compact structure quickly rearranges into a native three-dimensional structure as the polypeptide emerges from the tunnel.

Science, this issue p. 1104

Co-reporter:Frank Peske;Corinna Pohl;Ev Dannies;Cristina Maracci;Marina V. Rodnina
PNAS 2014 Volume 111 (Issue 40 ) pp:14418-14423
Publication Date(Web):2014-10-07
DOI:10.1073/pnas.1412676111
GTP hydrolysis by elongation factor Tu (EF-Tu), a translational GTPase that delivers aminoacyl-tRNAs to the ribosome, plays a crucial role in decoding and translational fidelity. The basic reaction mechanism and the way the ribosome contributes to catalysis are a matter of debate. Here we use mutational analysis in combination with measurements of rate/pH profiles, kinetic solvent isotope effects, and ion dependence of GTP hydrolysis by EF-Tu off and on the ribosome to dissect the reaction mechanism. Our data suggest that—contrary to current models—the reaction in free EF-Tu follows a pathway that does not involve the critical residue H84 in the switch II region. Binding to the ribosome without a cognate codon in the A site has little effect on the GTPase mechanism. In contrast, upon cognate codon recognition, the ribosome induces a rearrangement of EF-Tu that renders GTP hydrolysis sensitive to mutations of Asp21 and His84 and insensitive to K+ ions. We suggest that Asp21 and His84 provide a network of interactions that stabilize the positions of the γ-phosphate and the nucleophilic water, respectively, and thus play an indirect catalytic role in the GTPase mechanism on the ribosome.
Co-reporter:Joerg Mittelstaet ; Andrey L. Konevega ;Marina V. Rodnina
Journal of the American Chemical Society 2013 Volume 135(Issue 45) pp:17031-17038
Publication Date(Web):September 30, 2013
DOI:10.1021/ja407511q
Improving the yield of unnatural amino acid incorporation is an important challenge in producing novel designer proteins with unique chemical properties. Here we examine the mechanisms that restrict the incorporation of the fluorescent unnatural amino acid εNH2-Bodipy576/589-lysine (BOP-Lys) into a model protein. While the delivery of BOP-Lys-tRNALys to the ribosome is limited by its poor binding to elongation factor Tu (EF-Tu), the yield of incorporation into peptide is additionally controlled at the step of BOP-Lys-tRNA release from EF-Tu into the ribosome. The unnatural amino acid appears to disrupt the interactions that balance the strength of tRNA binding to EF-Tu-GTP with the velocity of tRNA dissociation from EF-Tu-GDP on the ribosome, which ensure uniform incorporation of standard amino acids. Circumventing this potential quality control checkpoint that specifically prevents incorporation of unnatural amino acids into proteins may provide a new strategy to increase yields of unnatural polymers.
Co-reporter:Lili K. Doerfel ;Marina V. Rodnina
Biopolymers 2013 Volume 99( Issue 11) pp:837-845
Publication Date(Web):
DOI:10.1002/bip.22341

ABSTRACT

The elongation phase of translation is promoted by three universal elongation factors, EF-Tu, EF-Ts, and EF-G in bacteria and their homologs in archaea and eukaryotes. Recent findings demonstrate that the translation of a subset of mRNAs requires a fourth elongation factor, EF-P in bacteria or the homologs factors a/eIF5A in other kingdoms of life. EF-P prevents the ribosome from stalling during the synthesis of proteins containing consecutive Pro residues, such as PPG, PPP, or longer Pro clusters. The efficient and coordinated synthesis of such proteins is required for bacterial growth, motility, virulence, and stress response. EF-P carries a unique post-translational modification, which contributes to its catalytic proficiency. The modification enzymes, which are lacking in higher eukaryotes, provide attractive new targets for the development of new, highly specific antimicrobials. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Biopolymers 99: 837–845, 2013.

Co-reporter:Lili K. Doerfel;Ingo Wohlgemuth;Christina Kothe;Frank Peske;Henning Urlaub;Marina V. Rodnina
Science 2013 Vol 339(6115) pp:85-88
Publication Date(Web):04 Jan 2013
DOI:10.1126/science.1229017
Co-reporter:Wolfgang Wintermeyer;Marina V. Rodnina
BIOspektrum 2011 Volume 17( Issue 4) pp:389-392
Publication Date(Web):2011 June
DOI:10.1007/s12268-011-0058-7
Genauigkeit und Geschwindigkeit der Proteinsynthese sind fundamentale Parameter für die Biologie von Zellen. Zur Optimierung benutzen Ribosomen komplexe Mechanismen der Substratselektion, vor allem induced fit und kinetische Partitionierung.Accuracy and speed of protein synthesis are fundamental parameters for the biology of cells. For optimization, ribosomes use complex mechanisms of substrate selection, in particular induced fit and kinetic partitioning.
Co-reporter:Marina V. Rodnina
PNAS 2009 Volume 106 (Issue 4 ) pp:969-970
Publication Date(Web):2009-01-27
DOI:10.1073/pnas.0812576106
Co-reporter:Florian Buhr, Sujata Jha, Michael Thommen, Joerg Mittelstaet, ... Anton A. Komar
Molecular Cell (4 February 2016) Volume 61(Issue 3) pp:341-351
Publication Date(Web):4 February 2016
DOI:10.1016/j.molcel.2016.01.008
•Quality of protein folding in cells is guided by synonymous codon usage•NMR reveals multiple conformational and oxidation states of synonymous variants•Synonymous codon usage in mRNA alters translation kinetics•Real-time cotranslational folding is guided by synonymous codon usageIn all genomes, most amino acids are encoded by more than one codon. Synonymous codons can modulate protein production and folding, but the mechanism connecting codon usage to protein homeostasis is not known. Here we show that synonymous codon variants in the gene encoding gamma-B crystallin, a mammalian eye-lens protein, modulate the rates of translation and cotranslational folding of protein domains monitored in real time by Förster resonance energy transfer and fluorescence-intensity changes. Gamma-B crystallins produced from mRNAs with changed codon bias have the same amino acid sequence but attain different conformations, as indicated by altered in vivo stability and in vitro protease resistance. 2D NMR spectroscopic data suggest that structural differences are associated with different cysteine oxidation states of the purified proteins, providing a link between translation, folding, and the structures of isolated proteins. Thus, synonymous codons provide a secondary code for protein folding in the cell.Download high-res image (202KB)Download full-size image
Co-reporter:Marina V. Rodnina, Wolfgang Wintermeyer
Journal of Molecular Biology (22 May 2016) Volume 428(Issue 10) pp:2165-2185
Publication Date(Web):22 May 2016
DOI:10.1016/j.jmb.2016.03.022
•Ribosome dynamics control decoding and translocation.•A specialized translation factor is required for the synthesis of proline stretches.•Programmed ribosome frameshifting is due to impeded translocation.•The ribosomal peptide exit tunnel directs co-translational protein folding.•The translocon opens laterally on ribosome binding and signal peptide insertion.The elongation phase of protein synthesis defines the overall speed and fidelity of protein synthesis and affects protein folding and targeting. The mechanisms of reactions taking place during translation elongation remain important questions in understanding ribosome function. The ribosome—guided by signals in the mRNA—can recode the genetic information, resulting in alternative protein products. Co-translational protein folding and interaction of ribosomes and emerging polypeptides with associated protein biogenesis factors determine the quality and localization of proteins. In this review, we summarize recent findings on mechanisms of translation elongation in bacteria, including decoding and recoding, peptide bond formation, tRNA–mRNA translocation, co-translational protein folding, interaction with protein biogenesis factors and targeting of ribosomes synthesizing membrane proteins to the plasma membrane. The data provide insights into how the ribosome shapes composition and quality of the cellular proteome.Download high-res image (52KB)Download full-size image
BENZAMIDE, N-[3-(1H-IMIDAZOL-1-YL)PROPYL]-4-[(1E)-3-METHYL-1-BUTENYL]-