We review the way in which atomic tetrahedra composed of metallic elements pack naturally into fused icosahedra. Orthorhombic, hexagonal, and cubic intermetallic crystals based on this packing are all shown to be united in having pseudo-fivefold rotational diffraction symmetry. A unified geometric model involving the 600-cell is presented: the model accounts for the observed pseudo-fivefold symmetries among the different Bravais lattice types. The model accounts for vertex-, edge-, polygon-, and cell-centered fused-icosahedral clusters. Vertex-centered and edge-centered types correspond to the well-known pseudo-fivefold symmetries in Ih and D5h quasicrystalline approximants. The concept of a tetrahedrally-packed reciprocal space cluster is introduced, the vectors between sites in this cluster corresponding to the principal diffraction peaks of fused-icosahedrally-packed crystals. This reciprocal-space cluster is a direct result of the pseudosymmetry and, just as the real-space clusters, can be rationalized by the 600-cell. The reciprocal space cluster provides insights for the Jones model of metal stability. For tetrahedrally-packed crystals, Jones zone faces prove to be pseudosymmetric with one another. Lower and upper electron per atom bounds calculated for this pseudosymmetry-based Jones model are shown to accord with the observed electron counts for a variety of Group 10–12 tetrahedrally-packed structures, among which are the four known Cu/Cd intermetallic compounds: CdCu2, Cd3Cu4, Cu5Cd8, and Cu3Cd10. The rationale behind the Jones lower and upper bounds is reviewed. The crystal structure of Zn11Au15Cd23, an example of a 1:1 MacKay cubic quasicrystalline approximant based solely on Groups 10–12 elements is presented. This compound crystallizes in Im (space group no. 204) with a=13.842(2) Å. The structure was solved with R1=3.53 %, I>2σ;=5.33 %, all data with 1282/0/38 data/restraints/parameters.
The structures of eight related known intermetallic structure types are the impetus to this paper: Li21Si5, Mg44Rh7, Zn13(Fe,Ni)2, Mg6Pd, Na6Tl, Zn91Ir11, Li13Na29Ba19, and Al69Ta39. All belong to the F3m space group, have roughly 400 atoms in their cubic unit cells, are built up at least partially from the γ-brass structure, and exhibit pseudo-tenfold symmetric diffraction patterns. These pseudo-tenfold axes lie in the 〈1 1 0〉 directions, and thus present a paradox. The 〈1 1 0〉 set is comprised of three pairs of perpendicular directions. Yet no 3D point group contains a single pair of perpendicular fivefold axes (by Friedel's Law, a fivefold axis leads to a tenfold diffraction pattern). The current work seeks to resolve this paradox. Its resolution is based on the largest of all 4D Platonic solids, the 600-cell. We first review the 600-cell, building an intuition discussing 4D polyhedroids (4D polytopes). We then show that the positions of common atoms in the F3m structures lie close to the positions of vertices in a 3D projection of the 600-cell. For this purpose, we develop a projection method that we call intermediate projection. The introduction of the 600-cell resolves the above paradox. This 4D Platonic solid contains numerous orthogonal fivefold rotations. The six fivefold directions that are best preserved after projection prove to lie along the 〈1 1 0〉 directions of the F3m structures. Finally, this paper shows that at certain ideal projected cluster sizes related to one another by the golden mean (τ=(1+√5)/2), constructive interference leading to tenfold diffraction patterns is optimized. It is these optimal values that predominate in actual F3m structures. Explicit comparison of experimental cluster sizes and theoretically derived cluster sizes shows a clear correspondence, both for isolated and crystalline pairs of projected 600-cells.
Of the most common cubic intermetallic structure types, several (MgCu2, Cu5Zn8, Ti2Ni, and α-Mn) have superstructures with unusual symmetry properties. These superstructures (Be5Au, Li21Si5, Sm11Cd45, and Mg44Ir7) have the unusual property of pairs of perpendicular pseudo fivefold axes, most apparent in their X-ray diffraction patterns. The current work shows that an 8D to 3D projection method cleanly describes most (and in one case, all) of the atomic positions in the four superstructures mentioned above. This type of projection, which maps the E8 lattice (a mathematically simple 8D crystal) into 3D space, combines the desired higher dimensional point group's perpendicular fivefold rotations with 3D translational symmetry—exactly what we see in the experimental crystal structures. The projection method successfully accounts for all heavy atom positions in the four superstructures, and at least 60–70 % of the light atom positions. The results suggest that all of these structures, previously known to be connected only by qualitative similarities in their atomic “clusters”, are approximants of a single, as-yet unknown, class of quasicrystal.
Higher-dimensional crystals have been studied for the last thirty years. However, most practicing chemists, materials scientists, and crystallographers continue to eschew the use of higher-dimensional crystallography in their work. Yet it has become increasingly clear in recent years that the number of higher-dimensional systems continues to grow from hundreds to as many as a thousand different compounds. Part of the problem has to do with the somewhat opaque language that has developed over the past decades to describe higher-dimensional systems. This language, while well-suited to the specialist, is too sophisticated for the neophyte wishing to enter the field, and as such can be an impediment. This Focus Review hopes to address this issue. The goal of this article is to show the regular chemist or materials scientist that knowledge of regular 3D crystallography is all that is really necessary to understand 4D crystal systems. To this end, we have couched higher-dimensional composite structures in the language of ordinary 3D crystals. In particular, we developed the principle of complementarity, which allows one to identify correctly 4D space groups solely from examination of the two 3D components that make up a typical 4D composite structure.
We present a new geometric description of Mg44Rh7, a compound with 408 atoms in its cubic unit cell. Using both experimental site preferences and LDA-DFT-calibrated extended Hückel (eH) calculations as guides, we highlight the structural units within Mg44Rh7 that reflect the electron-richness or electron-poorness of each crystallographic site. The units that best account for these site preferences and electron populations are 34- and 25-atom fragments of the Ti2Ni structure, rather than the variety of clusters often used to describe complicated intermetallic and ionic structures. These Ti2Ni pieces, located using a systematic search algorithm, fit together in a beautifully intricate network. An examination of this network reveals some surprising geometric features of Mg44Rh7, including a fractal-like arrangement of similar atomic formations on different length scales, geometrically connected to an approximate fivefold symmetry.
The search for meaningful clusters of atoms in the unit cell of a complicated intermetallic crystal is reminiscent of the search for constellations of stars in the sky. In their Full Paper on page 7852 ff., R. Hoffmann, S. Lee and R. F. Berger describe a quantum mechanically guided search for clusters of atoms in Mg44Rh7.
In den 1960er Jahren bestimmte Samson die Strukturen einiger der komplexesten intermetallischen Phasen, darunter NaCd2, Mg2Al3 und Cu3Cd4, die jeweils über 1000 Atome pro Elementarzelle aufweisen. Basierend auf den bemerkenswerten Arbeiten von Samson und Andersson verwenden wir quantenmechanische Rechnungen zur Beschreibung dieser Strukturen. Der formale Aufbau der Struktur auf der Grundlage der elektronischen Verhältnisse beginnt mit der relativ einfachen Mg17Al12-Struktur und setzt sich bis zu Samsons NaCd2-Struktur fort, wobei die Aufteilung in elektronenreiche und elektronenarme Gitterplätze (bezüglich der durchschnittlichen Elektronenzahl) bei beiden Strukturen das Vorliegen von Fragmenten des MgCu2-Typs aufdeckt. Die äußeren und inneren Bereiche eines solchen Fragments weisen unterschiedliche Bindungsverhältnisse auf: Der innere Bereich ist eher polar, während die Grenzflächen relativ unpolar sind. Dieser Sachverhalt kann mit der Geometrie der Grenzflächenplätze begründet werden, die zugleich an elektronenreichen wie auch elektronenarmen Gittern beteiligt sind. Die polaren und unpolaren Gitterplätze in NaCd2 sind durch eine Minimalfläche, die D-Fläche, voneinander getrennt. Die Argumente, die für eine solche Struktur sprechen, beruhen auf elektronischen Überlegungen. Ein entscheidendes Merkmal besteht darin, dass sich polare und unpolare Bindungstypen gegenseitig durchdringen. Diese Methode lässt sich auch auf andere Strukturen anwenden.
In the 1960s, Samson solved the structures of some of the most complicated intermetallic phases known, including those of NaCd2, Mg2Al3, and Cu3Cd4 (each with over 1000 atoms per unit cell). Following remarkable earlier constructions by Samson and by Andersson, we use quantum-mechanical calculations as a guide to describing and understanding these structures. Our electronic Aufbau begins with the relatively simple Mg17Al12 structure and works up to Samson's NaCd2 structure. In both structures, a division of the sites into electron-rich and electron-poor (with respect to an average electron count) reveals MgCu2-type fragments. Between the interiors and exteriors of these fragments, a change in bonding character takes place—the interiors are more polar, the interfaces relatively nonpolar. This electronic situation is traced to the geometry of the interface sites; they lie simultaneously on electron-rich and electron-poor networks. The resulting polar and nonpolar sites in NaCd2 are separated by a minimal surface, the D surface. The driving force for assuming this structure is electronic: NaCd2 features an interpenetration of polar and nonpolar bonding regions. This sort of thinking can be applied to other structures.
We present single-crystal studies of Pd0.213Cd0.787 and Pd0.235Cd0.765, synchrotron powder studies of Pd1−xCdx, 0.755≥x≥0.800, and LDA-DFT and extended Hückel (eH) calculations on these or related phases. The two single-crystal structures have a, b, and c axis lengths of 9.9013(7), 14.0033(10), 37.063(24) and 9.9251(3), 14.0212(7), 60.181(3) Å, respectively and they crystallize in the space groups Ccme and F2mm, respectively (solved as (3+1)-dimensional crystals their most convenient superspace group is Xmmm(00γ)s00). The structures have two different structural components each with their own separate axis parameters. Powder data shows that the ratio of these separate axes (S/L) varies from 1.615 to 1.64, values near the golden mean (1.618). For Pd0.213Cd0.787, different Pd and Cd site occupancies lead to variation in the R factor from 2.6–3.6 %. The site occupancy pattern with the lowest R factor (among the 26 820 variants studied) is the exact site occupancy pattern predicted by LDA-DFT parameterized eH Mulliken charge populations. The phases can be understood through a chemical twinning principle found in γ-brass, the parent structure for the above phases (a relation with the MgCu2 Laves phase is also noted). This twinning principle can be used to account for Cd and Pd site preferences. At the same time there is a clean separation among the Cd and Pd atoms for the two separate chain types at height b=0 and 1/2. These results indicate that Cd:Pd stoichiometry plays a role in phase stability.
The total electronic energies of the six electrons per atom (e− per atom) alloys W, TaRe, HfOs, and YIr and the seven electrons per atom alloys Re, WOs, TaIr, HfPt, and YAu have been calculated in the local density approximation of density functional theory. When one considers common alloy structures such as atomically ordered variants of the body-centered cubic, face-centered cubic, or hexagonally closest packed structures and plots the total electronic energy as a function of the unit cell parameter, one finds for both the six and seven electrons per atom series energetic isosbestic points. An energetic isosbestic point corresponds to a critical value of the size parameter for which all members of the 6 or 7 e− per atom series of compounds have nearly identical total electronic energy. Just as in spectroscopy, where the existence of such isosbestic points is the hallmark of two compounds present in the mixture, an energy isosbestic point1, 2 implies there are just two separate energy curves. For both series it is found that the total electronic energy can be viewed as the weighted sum of a purely covalent term and a purely ionic term. Two semi-quantitative models are proposed to account for these two separate energies. In the first model the total energy is viewed as the sum of the elemental structural energy plus an ionic energy based on the Born–Mayer ionic model. In the second model one considers within the confines of μ2-Hückel theory the evolution of the total electronic energy as the Coulombic Hii integrals change in value.