Bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) are crucial growth factors from embryonic development up to adult organ/tissue homeostasis since they regulate versatile processes such as stem cell maintenance, differentiation and migration. Aberrant signalling leads to pathologies including cancer or musculoskeletal and vascular diseases. Here, we provide an overview of the BMP signalling cascade and its complex regulation and show how we investigate this tightly controlled protein network in physiological and pathological model systems.

The musculoskeletal system is a tight network of many tissues. Coordinated interplay at a biochemical level between tissues is essential for development and repair. Traumatic injury usually affects several tissues and represents a large challenge in clinical settings. The current demand for potent growth factors in such applications thus accompanies the keen interest in molecular mechanisms and orchestration of tissue formation. Of special interest are multitasking growth factors that act as signals in a variety of cell types, both in a paracrine and in an autocrine manner, thereby inducing cell differentiation and coordinating not only tissue assembly at specific sites but also maturation and homeostasis. We concentrate here on bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs), which are important crosstalk mediators known for their irreplaceable roles in vertebrate development. The molecular crosstalk during embryonic musculoskeletal tissue formation is recapitulated in adult repair. BMPs act at different levels from the initiation to maturation of newly formed tissue. Interestingly, this is influenced by the spatiotemporal expression of different BMPs, their receptors and co-factors at the site of repair. Thus, the regenerative potential of BMPs needs to be evaluated in the context of highly connected tissues such as muscle and bone and might indeed be different in more poorly connected tissues such as cartilage. This highlights the need for an understanding of BMP signaling across tissues in order to eventually improve BMP regenerative potential in clinical applications. In this review, the distinct members of the BMP family and their individual contribution to musculoskeletal tissue repair are summarized by focusing on their paracrine and autocrine functions.

Discussion at a meeting in Berlin, Germany, showed that BMPs have essential functions in organs and tissues besides bone.

Bone Morphogenetic Proteins (BMPs) play an important role during organ development and during regeneration after tissue damage. BMPs signal via transmembrane serine/threonine kinase receptors. From our current understanding heteromeric complexes of type I and type II receptors are required for signal propagation. Presently, three type I and three type II receptors are known to bind BMPs with different affinities. Ligands and receptors eventually oligomerize via defined modes into signaling complexes. Co-receptors recruit into these complexes to either inhibit or to promote signaling. The Smad pathway, initiated by phosphorylation through the activated type I receptors, results in transcriptional regulation of early target genes. However, on its way to the nucleus, Smads represent signaling platforms for other pathways, which eventually finetune BMP signal transduction. We also describe BMP-induced signaling cascades leading to cytoskeletal rearrangements, non-transcriptional and non-Smad pathways. BMPs induce a plethora of different cellular effects ranging from stem cell maintenance, migration, differentiation, proliferation to apoptosis. The molecular mechanism, by which the same ligand induces these manifold effects, depends on the cellular context. Here we try to give a current picture of the most important players in regulating and directing BMP signaling towards the desired cellular outcome. Examples of BMP action during development, but also physiological and pathophysiological conditions in the adult organism are presented.

•TGFβ ligands fall into four functionally distinct subgroups differing in receptor activation and signaling modulation.•A large number of TGFβ/BMP ligands signal though a limited set of receptor.•Numeral ligand–receptor discrepancy leads to promiscuous receptor usage.•Mechanisms have evolved to facilitate not only correct ligand-type I receptor pairing but also strict type I receptor-Smad pairing ensuring activation of only one particular SMAD branch.•Structures of TGFβ/BMP receptor kinases enable the design of specific kinase inhibitors.Bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) are members of the transforming growth factor-β family (TGFβ), which signal through hetero-tetrameric complexes of type I and type II receptors. In humans there are many more TGFβ ligands than receptors, leading to the question of how particular ligands can initiate specific signaling responses. Here we review structural features of the ligands and receptors that contribute to this specificity. Ligand activity is determined by receptor–ligand interactions, growth factor prodomains, extracellular modulator proteins, receptor assembly and phosphorylation of intracellular signaling proteins, including Smad transcription factors. Detailed knowledge about the receptors has enabled the development of BMP-specific type I receptor kinase inhibitors. In future these may help to treat human diseases such as fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva.Download high-res image (95KB)Download full-size image

An immense number of cellular processes are initiated by cell surface serine/threonine kinase receptors belonging to the TGF-β/BMP family. Subsequent downstream signalling cascades, as well as their crosstalk results in enormous specificity in terms of phenotypic outcome, e.g. proliferation, differentiation, migration or apoptosis. Such signalling diversity is achieved by the ability of receptors to interact with distinct proteins in a spatio-temporal manner. Following the cloning of the TGF-β/BMP receptors a variety of different technologies were applied to identify such interacting proteins. Here we present a comprehensive survey of known interactome analyses, including our own data, on these receptors and discuss advantages and disadvantages of the applied technologies.