The binding interactions of three naphthalimide derivatives with heteropoly nucleic acids have been evaluated using fluorescence, absorption and circular dichroism spectroscopies. Mono- and bifunctionalized naphthalimides exhibit sequence-dependent variations in their affinity toward DNA. The heteropoly nucleic acids, [Poly(dA-dT)]₂ and [Poly(dG-dC)]₂, as well as calf thymus (CT) DNA, were used to understand the factors that govern binding strength and selectivity. Sequence selectivity was addressed by determining the binding constants as a function of polynucleotide composition according to the noncooperative McGhee–von Hippel binding model. Binding affinities toward [poly(dA-dT)]₂ were the largest for spermine-substituted naphthalimides (K_b = 2−6 × 10⁶ m⁻¹). The association constants for complex formation between the cationic naphthalmides and [poly(dG-dC)]₂ or CT DNA (58% A-T content) were 2–500 times smaller, depending on the naphthalmide–polynucleotide pair. The binding modes were also assessed using a combination of induced circular dichroism and salt effects to determine whether the naphthalimides associate with DNA through intercalative, electrostatic or groove-binding. The results show that the monofunctionalized spermine and pyridinium-substituted naphthalimides associate with DNA through electrostatic interactions. In contrast, intercalative interactions are predominant in the complex formed between the bifunctionalized spermine compound and all of the polynucleotides.

Using water-soluble 1,8-naphthalimide derivatives, the mechanisms of photosensitized DNA damage have been elucidated. Specifically, a comparison of rate constants for the photoinduced relaxation of supercoiled to circular DNA, as a function of dissolved halide, oxygen and naphthalimide concentration, has been carried out. The singlet excited states of the naphthalimide derivatives were quenched by chloride, bromide and iodide. In all cases the quenching products were naphthalimide triplet states, produced by induced intersystem crossing within the collision complex. Similarly, the halides were found to quench the triplet excited state of the 1,8-naphthalimide derivatives by an electron transfer mechanism. Bimolecular rate constants were <10⁵M⁻¹ s⁻¹ for quenching by bromide and chloride. As expected from thermodynamic considerations quenching by iodide was 6.7 × 10⁹ and 8.8 × 10⁹M⁻¹ s⁻¹ for the two 1,8-naphthalimide derivatives employed. At sufficiently high ground-state concentration self-quenching of the naphthalimide triplet excited state also occurs. The photosensitized conversion of supercoiled to circular DNA is fastest when self-quenching reactions are favored. The results suggest that, in the case of 1,8-naphthalimide derivatives, radicals derived from quenching of the triplet state by ground-state chromophores are more effective in cleaving DNA than reactive oxygen species or radicals derived from halogen atoms.

The ground- and excited-state interactions of polymethylene-linked 1,8-naphthalimide–viologen dyads with calf-thymus DNA have been investigated. By virtue of the covalently attached viologen, the compounds represent the first example of linked chromophore/cosensitizer systems in the photooxidation of duplex DNA. The compounds associate strongly with DNA. Analysis of ground-state spectral changes yield binding constants of 0.7–2.5 × 10⁶M⁻¹. Upon 355 nm pulsed irradiation of the compounds in the presence of calf-thymus DNA, reduced viologen is observed within the laser pulse. Photoproducts are not observed on this time scale in the absence of DNA. Since ground-state bleaching of the naphthalimide was not observed, the results suggest that DNA nucleobases are the species being oxidized. The quantum efficiency of radical production increases with the extent of binding to DNA. Under conditions where the compounds are bound predominantly to DNA, the quantum efficiencies were found to range from 0.02 to 0.03. Although small, the values represent a substantial increase in charge-separation yield compared to 1,8-naphthalimide compounds that lack the covalently attached viologen. The mechanism of radical production and effect of number of intervening methylenes are discussed.